Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 09:18 on 26 January 2025 (UTC). if it is out of date.
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by HBC AIV helperbot14 (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
Reports
[edit]- Elite114 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:40, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2405:201:6006:9188:acef:5d37:4868:7b33 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 45.64.241.206 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 547 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 547, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 蒙古天骄 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 136.57.126.48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Voiceless uvular fricative (diff): vandalism after final warning. Nardog (talk) 08:10, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2405:6E00:62B:F3AB:24D0:38FF:FEFB:5A6F (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Clarence (American TV series) (diff): vandalism after final warning. Geraldo Perez (talk) 08:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 223.185.35.41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Evidently only vandalising pages Captainllama (talk) 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 111.92.11.182 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Spamming Indian Television related articles by changing logo and names. United Blasters (talk) 08:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC
Subject: Non-autoconfirmed User Engaging in Disruptive Rapid Reverts
Dear Administrators,
I am reporting a non-autoconfirmed user with the IP address 2405:201:6006:9188:ACEF:5D37:4868:7B33, who is engaging in disruptive rapid reverts on Wikipedia articles. The user's actions appear to violate Wikipedia's guidelines on constructive editing and edit warring.
Details:
The user has been reverting edits without providing valid reasons or engaging in discussions.
Their behavior is disruptive and affects the integrity of the articles they are editing.
I have reverted some of their edits and left a warning on their talk page, but the behavior has not stopped.
Evidence (Diff Links to Problematic Edits):
1. Diff Link 1
Explanation:
2. Diff Link 2
Explanation:
3. Diff Link 3
Explanation:
User Contributions:
User’s Contributions Page
I kindly request administrative action to prevent further disruption. If necessary, I suggest considering temporary page protection to restrict edits to autoconfirmed users.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Best regards, [Theditorial2.0]